Gibson Les Paul Traditional 2018 cracked headstock

Gibson Les Paul Traditional 2018 cracked headstock  ·  Source: Gibson

Gibson Les Paul Traditional 2018 cracked headstock

Gibson USA Les Paul Traditional 2018 now with pre-cracked headstocks!  ·  Source: Gibson

Gibson is at it again and this time they are advertising their Les Paul Traditional 2018 model on their own website with a clearly pre-cracked headstock! 

Les Paul Traditional 2018 head break

You really could not make it up. Gibson USA has (again!) advertised a brand new Les Paul Traditional 2018 model, this time it has a headstock that’s clearly cracked!

After last month’s debacle with a damaged and chipped Les Paul being used in the company’s own marketing, they have done it again. If you look closely you can clearly see a massive crack across the bottom of the headstock on this Les Paul. I cannot understand how Gibson has let this happen again. With this kind of thing going on, it is no wonder they are having to sell their Memphis factory.

The story broke over at thefretboard forum in the UK and it just goes to show how Gibson is really not taking much care of their own reputation these days. Yes, the back of the neck is dark, but you can clearly see a huge crack along the bottom of the headstock. It goes to show how weak that area can be with a Les Paul.

Of course, it is not ideal for Gibson themselves to be using such a guitar to promote the brand…

RRP – USD 2,639 and comes with a pre-broken headstock!

Gibson Les Paul Traditional 2018 cracked headstock

Gibson Les Paul Traditional 2018 cracked headstock

Gibson Les paul Traditional 2018 with a cracked headstock

Gibson Les Paul Traditional 2018 with a cracked headstock

You can check out the break in full here

For more Gibson articles click here

by Jef

108
Leave a Reply

58 Comment threads
50 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
60 Comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
caclark74

#facepalm

GeneralGeorgeSPatton

That’s not a crack you morons, it’s not even in weak spot in the neck, it doesn’t even look like a scratch, it looks some buffing compound that just needs to be rubbed off.

Calis Sims

Buffing compound my ass.

Julien-Pier Bélanger

Whatever it is, it could easily be fixed be hiring a decent photographer

blueangel69

Yeah, doesn’t look like a crack to me. Fake news.

F Munky

It has also been reported by more people over on Gibson’s own site and their forum. Yet, Gibson has removed the persons comments apparently, so something is up.

http://forum.gibson.com/index.php?/topic/139681-2018-cracked-headstock-gibson-les-paul-traditional-tobacco-burst/

Randy Kirby

Just buy an ESP Eclipse and be done with it…..

Stephen Hales

That’s called settling for less.

Richard Harrold

Except it’s not less. Go Tokai for an authentic well-made LP.

James

People that like Les Pauls: Jimmy Page, Slash, Billy Gibbons, Eric Clapton, Randy Rhoads, Joe Perry, Duane Allman. People that like ESP Eclipses : Randy Kirby ..

F Munky

They managed to ‘Photoshop’ out the serial number, but left the fucking great crack in the neck! PMSL

Snake Plissken

They don’t photoshop the serial numbers off in any of these pictures on their website, that partial serial number you see in just the white residual buffing dust the use to do the final polish, as is the scuff mark that drama queens are calling a crack. Les Pauls don’t even crack in that location, the weak spot in on the neck not on the headstock.

Done to Death

Google “Gibson headstock break” to see plenty of pictures of cracks EXACTLY on that location. Why do Gibson people not know about this?

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ✓ ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

You won’t find a single one, if you think otherwise then post a link to it.

Richard Harrold

He has posted loads of links, that’s a classic LP break.

David Smith

I have a 2016 les paul traditional . I have owned les pauls from the 70s and 80s . And the 2016 is one of the best i have owned !!
The pick-ups sound amazing and never had to do anything as far as setups or anything .

Stephen Hales

I have a 17 Trad and it’s excellent in all aspects. Bought a 17 PRS Singlecut at the same time and it’s just not in the same league..nice but very dark.

Done to Death

Sounds like you got a good one. It doesn’t change the fact that the one in the picture clearly has a cracked headstock. It’s pretty easy to repair, and usually the repair is stronger than the original wood. But Gibson should know better than to include that picture in their ad copy.

Bobby Lynn

I agree, not a crack. scratch? Buffing compound? Maybe. With that being said, marketing screwed the pooch on the photo no matter how you look at it. Evidently the photographer never checked his “subject” and Gibson did not sign off on the photo. Snap and print.

Done to Death

Definitely a crack.

Stephen Hales

This anti-Gibson shit is hilarious. It’s a reflection and that’s not even where headstocks typically crack. Gearnews owned by Fox by any chance?

Liberals AreIdiots

No it’s owned by CNN

Richard Harrold

Actually, no, that’s not a reflection, it’s a classic headstock break where they all go.

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ✓ ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

The internet has turned into a cesspool of retаrds, that’s not a crack, it’s a scuff make that you can run off with your hand, The person who spent all this time putting this article together could have at least picked up a Les Paul to see that’s not even the location on neck where they breaks.

Done to Death

Yeah. Okay. You know, one quick Google images search for “Gibson headstock break” will show you that that is EXACTLY where they break. Do some research before you go proving that you don’t have a clue. Especially if you’re going to imply that not knowing the facts makes one mentally deficient.

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ✓ ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

You’re a little child, if you think they break in that location then provide a link, because it’;s more than obviously you’ve never played a Gibson let allow taken off the truss rod cover to adjust the truss rod because you’s see right away where the weak spot is.

Done to Death
Done to Death
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ✓ ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

that is easily two inches below that scratch, that scratch is just under the tuner, I doubt anyone is surprised you couldn’t find one, because it’s not where Gibson necks break.

Proud American ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

You’re talking out of your aѕѕ. You could have at least taken a few minutes to look at where the weak spot on the neck actually is, instead of making a complete fool out of yourself. |I’m actually embarrassed for you.

Done to Death
Proud American ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

Yes that is typically where they break, right where they are bored out for the clearance of the truss rod nut, it is their weakest point, not where that scuff mark is on the headstock in the Gibson website picture. Compare that to the picture on Gibson’s website and you’ll clearly see it’s not a crack, but it looks exactly like it rubbed against the edge of something white.

Richard Harrold

Proud American, you’re talking horseshyte. This photo is clearly a headstock break, and it’s not the first damaged guitar to appear on Gibson’s website recently.

MamaJama

FYI, I googled “Gibson headstock break” and it’s perfectly clear that the spot the crack in this article is in is NOT where they break. oops.

Done to Death
Mack Doggs

It’s a crack. Joints break in a variety of ways around that area.

KeatonBuster

This is nonsense. The newest models are some of the best instruments Gibson has ever produced. Internet trolls drag an amazing tool that the internet is down into the gutter. Idiots gotta be idiots, I guess.

Done to Death

There is clearly a crack on the headstock of this guitar. Is that “amazing? ”
People complain about lapses in quality control. For the price that Gibson charges for their guitars, they should be perfect. Pointing out a headstock crack/repair is not “idiots being idiots.”
Also, do you work for Gibson, or are you just defending your (overpriced) purchase?

MILDEW

That’s obviously buffing scuff and not even where they break. They break inches bellow unless it’s a vertical crack, and that usually V’s down the neck from the tuners.

Pete49

Looks like a reflection to me.

Done to Death

Yeah, a reflection of Gibson’s poor quality control. There are lots of good ones out there, but play before you buy.

B. Scott Farthingsworth

Still ridiculously overpriced. Can buy 2-3 equal quality guitars with that money and have better customer service. I was done with Gibson 15 years ago. I’ll get a used one off CL for a fraction of the price. Fuckem.

Arthur P Nus
Bryon Settle

Having sold and repaired Gibson LPs for over twenty years, if you showed me that photo and asked me what’s wrong here, I’d have to say that looks like a cracked headstock. To whoever said Gibson LPs don’t crack there, I’d say you haven’t seen very many cracked Gibsons.

Done to Death

Same here, Bryan. In fact, that could be a fine instrument, are long as you’re not charging full price for it. 🙂

Proud American ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

How can you have possibly repaired Gibsons for over 20 years and not even know that scratch is even above where volutes where on the Norlin models? I’ve seen my fair share of cracked necks over the last 40 years and It’s not where Gibson necks crack

blueangel69

But the idiocy behind the notion that Gibson would release a photo of a damaged product is the real story here. People need to quit smoking crack.

Secret man

Fake News

Robert Robinson

Scarff joint crack.

Don DiMasi

They don’t use a scarf joint…

Done to Death

That’s why they break. A scarf joint is stronger.

Jim Demestihas

traditionally they do crack there……..perhaps thats why it looks cracked there? Authenticity at reproducing tradition.

jimmy ventouris

Hurry !!, if they are such bad guitars you need to let the people who have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for these crappy guitars that have managed to survive since the 1950s !!

I’m more concerned by how anyone can call themselves a journalist these days.

Done to Death

I think the high price is why people defend Gibson so rabidly. Buyer’s remorse is a thing.
Sure, there are some great guitars out there, but Gibson QC has been off the mark for a while now. Play before you buy.

jimmy ventouris

A cracked headstock is not a quality control issue and I seriously doubt that they ship this way lol ,,the cracked headstock is a weakness in their design,,,a very old and iconic design,,,,,in other words if you invest all that money in a Les Paul don’t drop it.

warrenbty

What… did I miss Gibson backing President Trump? That is the only reason for something as sad as this. Honestly no one is buying the EXACT guitar on the promo pic and is this stating EVERY LP Gibson is selling is defective? No They probably did not want a 5k prop tossed around in the photo shoot and grabbed one that did not make it due to the crack all be it the photographer should of airbrushed it out like a playmates birthmark…

Henri

My Washburn acoustic has exactly the same shape crack in exactly the same place.

Done to Death

There’s some serious Gibson koolaid going around. Gibson quality has always been sketchy enough that you should definitely play the exact guitar you’re considering buying. They have been known, like many other manufacturers, to use less than perfect guitars, and refurbish them for sale. This is not a huge deal except that Gibson charges a premium for a perception of near perfection, when the guitars they put out are really about average. There are great guitars, and poor ones. Play before you buy. Also, that line in the headstock is definitely a crack. Cracks can be repaired stronger than new,… Read more »

blueangel69

Sounds like you wrote this on the toilet. Hope everything came out good. Maybe tomorrow morn you can enlighten us about Fender.

Done to Death

Sounds like you’ve got things all figured out. Enjoy overpaying.

Mack Doggs

It’s fan boys that worship jimi page think gibsons are the greatest thing ever. In reality they’ve been crappy since the mid 60’s.

Neil Picton

I would NEVER buy another Gibson !! Past8 years Ive been hooked on Carparelli guitars !!! All Im gonna say is TRY ONE !!!!!!

EofA

Ummmmm…. where did this photo come from? If you go to the link in the story, that suspected “crack” (polish residue) is not on their website.

F Munky
Richard Harrold

It was on their website and is definitely a headstock snap, not residue or scuffing.

Mack Doggs

Gibson apologists are basically Trump supporters at this point.

“It’s not a crack! There’s no Russia connection!”

Lasse

They managed to ‘Photoshop’ out the serial number, but left the fucking great crack in the neck! PMSL

Snake Plissken

If you look at all the other pictures you’ll see, they don’t photoshop out serial numbers, it’s just bad lighting that’s why that scuff mark stands out so much.

Ronald Reagan

It looks exactly like you’d expect a light scratch or scuff mark to look in a lacquer finish. I’m surprised they didn’t buff it out before they posted the picture on their website. They probably use a third party to do their website and photography.

http://www.tdpri.com/attachments/img_3148-jpg.416758/

florian schafer

Google “Gibson headstock break” to see plenty of pictures of cracks EXACTLY on that location. Why do Gibson people not know about this?

trevoraramay

That’s either a scratch or a reflection, and it REALLY looks like a shitty reflection. This article is ridiculous, it reads like a Buzzfeed article, “Gibson Now Selling Broken Guitars? You Won’t Believe What Happens Next!!!”. Someone clearly has way too much time on their hands.

thefyn

Haha. Oh man. I did a video on Gibson’a issues in March. It goes way deeper than bad marketing: https://youtu.be/S8X7aWsl5AM

Milan

Scarff joint crack.

Richard Harrold

They don’t have a scarf joint.

Luc Neumann

Scarff joint crack.

Lasse

traditionally they do crack there……..perhaps thats why it looks cracked there? Authenticity at reproducing tradition.

TheUndertaker

But the idiocy behind the notion that Gibson would release a photo of a damaged product is the real story here. People need to quit smoking crack.

Demolidor Sinistro

That’s a bad photoshop work. The tunner is hiding part of the serial number. I guess its fake news or hacked site.

F Munky
Theo Braun

That’s not a crack you morons, it’s not even in weak spot in the neck, it doesn’t even look like a scratch, it looks some buffing compound that just needs to be rubbed off.

Tony Schafer

He has posted loads of links, that’s a classic LP break.

Duke of Wolves

There’s some serious Gibson koolaid going around. Gibson quality has always been sketchy enough that you should definitely play the exact guitar you’re considering buying. They have been known, like many other manufacturers, to use less than perfect guitars, and refurbish them for sale. This is not a huge deal except that Gibson charges a premium for a perception of near perfection, when the guitars they put out are really about average.There are great guitars, and poor ones. Play before you buy. Also, that line in the headstock is definitely a crack. Cracks can be repaired stronger than new, and… Read more »

nils

Actually, no, that’s not a reflection, it’s a classic headstock break where they all go.

till sauer

Sounds like you got a good one. It doesn’t change the fact that the one in the picture clearly has a cracked headstock. It’s pretty easy to repair, and usually the repair is stronger than the original wood. But Gibson should know better than to include that picture in their ad copy.

Luc Neumann

Sounds like you got a good one. It doesn’t change the fact that the one in the picture clearly has a cracked headstock. It’s pretty easy to repair, and usually the repair is stronger than the original wood. But Gibson should know better than to include that picture in their ad copy.

Dominic

A cracked headstock is not a quality control issue and I seriously doubt that they ship this way lol ,,the cracked headstock is a weakness in their design,,,a very old and iconic design,,,,,in other words if you invest all that money in a Les Paul don’t drop it.

Milan

traditionally they do crack there……..perhaps thats why it looks cracked there? Authenticity at reproducing tradition.

Hannes Kuhn

He has posted loads of links, that’s a classic LP break.

Duke of Wolves

Sounds like you got a good one. It doesn’t change the fact that the one in the picture clearly has a cracked headstock. It’s pretty easy to repair, and usually the repair is stronger than the original wood. But Gibson should know better than to include that picture in their ad copy.

Ricardo D'Orlando

I don’t mind it, can I get a nice discount ????

Theo Braun

Sounds like you got a good one. It doesn’t change the fact that the one in the picture clearly has a cracked headstock. It’s pretty easy to repair, and usually the repair is stronger than the original wood. But Gibson should know better than to include that picture in their ad copy.

Bulldozer

You won’t find a single one, if you think otherwise then post a link to it.

Milan

Same here, Bryan. In fact, that could be a fine instrument, are long as you’re not charging full price for it. 🙂

Lasse

That’s why they break. A scarf joint is stronger.

finnb

This is nonsense. The newest models are some of the best instruments Gibson has ever produced. Internet trolls drag an amazing tool that the internet is down into the gutter. Idiots gotta be idiots, I guess.