Approximate reading time: 2 Minutes
Alnico vs Ceramic pickups, but which sounds better?

Alnico vs Ceramic pickups, but which sounds better?  ·  Source: Darell Braun Guitars/YouTube

We guitarists are an argumentative bunch, and the guitar world is full of opinions and arguments about how to get the best sounds. One controversy that has raged for years is: What exactly IS the difference in sound between ceramic and alnico pickups? Now someone has come up with a Mythbusters-style video doing an A/B test to throw new light on this question…

Ceramic vs. Alnico

You often hear that the sound of a pickup is dominated by the choice of magnet used in its construction. Alnico is nice and warm and great for blues. Whereas Ceramic is used in metal as it sounds tight, loud and cool. So we often hear. Is this all just a rumour launched by pickup manufacturers, or is it objectively provable?

YouTuber Darell Braun Guitars has tried to figure it out and come up with a simple way to compare the two different magnet types. Same guitar, same strings. Different pickups or different magnets.

Now, the real pickup geeks will chirp in and tell us about the different types of Alnico and polepieces used, the wire gauge and type. Then there are the pickup connoisseurs that will start talking about bobbins and spacers. But I find it’s probably best to avoid getting into an argument with these people, as whatever you say, you will be wrong…

A whole ’boutique’ industry has formed in the last 30 years. It revolves around the variances in the design of the humble pickup. Whether you are a single-coil, humbucker or P90 lover, there is something on the market for you these days. There are great pickups available from companies like Seymour Duncan, DiMarzio, Oil City Pickups and Bare Knuckle. Us guitarists are spoilt for choice when it comes to choosing a new set for our favourite guitar.

This comparison ‘test’ is certainly worth a watch and at the least gives you an idea about what you can expect from the two magnet types.


by Jef

Leave a Reply

4 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
ericJohnLeeStratfunkerKelsey Austin Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of


Funny they say alnico is vintage and natural and ceramic is modern and artificial… ceramic pickups have been around since end of 60s really. Plus whatever is natural or artificial in guitar tone anyway? Sure, they have slightly different frequency ranges, but so have different alnicos compaired to eachother. Next to bust: nitro lacquer breathing, poly doesnt…

William Paxson

When Bill Lawrence (who probably forgot more about pickups than most of the modern pickup “gurus” know) addressed the “ceramic is harsh and alnico is sweet” subject, he famously replied “Who the hell preaches such nonsense?” He maintained that the design of the magnetic circuit determined what magnet to use (and consequently how that pickup was going to sound) and that you could take either a ceramic or alnico magnet and make a pickup with either sound however you wanted it to by how you designed the rest of the pickup.

Kelsey Austin

Interesting topic about pickup magnet choice. I can tell you that slight changes in magnets can produce noticeable changes in tone. I recently re-charged some of my old pickups using a “permanent magnet”. It was quite easy and really rejuvinated my Humbuckers.


Ceramic pickups have more ‘bite’, wich helps get a crunchy sound even if can’t afford a real classy tube amp. But if you want a nice clean tone, go Alnico 5. It’s like the difference between the Stones and the Beatles imho 🙂


did u not watch the video?


I have a ceramic neck pickup in my guitar as i found it had a better top end really cut through and a decent amount of mid and lower end. I prefered it to my alnico slash pickup. But in the bridge some say they are duller and i dont think that is entirely true it may sound like it. But i think its more to do with it being higher output and its driving the lows and mids harder. Giving the impression of dullness. But for this really i kept the alnico slash bridge. I could probably offset it… Read more »


Old guy here hacking guitars since mid 60’s One thing not mentioned in the debate is that the ceramic field engages more of the pickup winding, being a wider bar. More windings covered by the field result in wider frequency response, so the his are in proportion with other frequencies being generated. Thus a warmer or rounded sound. Traditional alnicos have their field stronger thru the long axis and less of the windings are used, thus resulting in a more sharp, hi freq sound. (Reference an alnico tele neck pickup and how thin it sounds with the fewer windings). My… Read more »